is. ?at ?o
?inges ?at men don now ?{a}t ?ei ne weren to bitiden. first or ?ei were
ydon ? and ?ilk same ?inges al ?ou? ?
{a}t men
hadde{n}
ywyst hem
by-forn.
?itte ?ei han fre bitidynges. for ry?t as science of ?inges
p{re}sent ne brynge? in no necessite to ?inges [?{a}t men doon // Ryht
so the p{re}science of thinges to comen ne bryngeth in no necessite to
thinges] to bytiden but ?ou mayst seyn ?at of ?ilke same it is ydouted.
as whe?er ?at of ?
