er of hem ben p{er}fit. so as ey?er of hem lakki? to
o?ir. but ?at ?at nis nat p{er}fit men may seen apertly ?at it nis nat
souereyne. ?e ?inges ?an ?at ben souereynely goode ne mowen by no wey
ben diuerse. ?
But I haue wel
conclude
?
at blisfulnesse {and} god ben
[the] souereyne goode. For whiche it mot nedes be ?at souereyne
blisfulnesse is souerey[ne] dyuynite. ? No ?ing q{uo}d I nis more
so?efast ?an ?is ne more ferme by resou{n}. ne a more wor?i ?ing ?an god
may nat ben concluded. _P._ vpon ?
