t[e] to
su{m}mitten
it self {and} to ben byne?
Chaucer - Boethius
e deuyne ?
ou?
t as we *ben p{ar}son{er}s of
resou{n}. ry? t so as we han demed. it byhoue? ? at ymaginac{i}ou{n}
{and} wit ben byne? e resou{n}. ry? t so wolde 4944
we deme{n} ? at it were ry? tful ? ing ? at ma{n}s resou{n}
au?
t[e] to su{m}mitten it self {and} to ben byne? e ? e deuyne
? ou? t.
[Sidenote: Let us, therefore, strive to elevate ourselves to the
height of the supreme intelligence--there shall reason see what
she cannot discover in herself; and that is in what manner the
prescience of God sees and defines all things; although they have
no certain event; and she will see that this is no mere
conjecture, but rather simple, supreme, and unlimited knowledge. ]
for whiche ? at yif we mowen. as who sei? .
? at yif ? at we mowe{n} I conseil[e] ? at we enhanse vs in 4948
to ? e hey? t of ?
resou{n}. ry? t so as we han demed. it byhoue? ? at ymaginac{i}ou{n}
{and} wit ben byne? e resou{n}. ry? t so wolde 4944
we deme{n} ? at it were ry? tful ? ing ? at ma{n}s resou{n}
au?
t[e] to su{m}mitten it self {and} to ben byne? e ? e deuyne
? ou? t.
[Sidenote: Let us, therefore, strive to elevate ourselves to the
height of the supreme intelligence--there shall reason see what
she cannot discover in herself; and that is in what manner the
prescience of God sees and defines all things; although they have
no certain event; and she will see that this is no mere
conjecture, but rather simple, supreme, and unlimited knowledge. ]
for whiche ? at yif we mowen. as who sei? .
? at yif ? at we mowe{n} I conseil[e] ? at we enhanse vs in 4948
to ? e hey? t of ?
