And
demyst ?ou q{uo}d she ?at a ?ing ?at is of ?is manere.
?at is to seine suffisau{n}t {and} my?ty au?t[e] to ben dispised.
or ellys ?{a}t it be ry?t digne of reuerences abouen 2300
alle ?inges.
[Sidenote: _B.
_ They are
doubtless
highly estimable.
_P._ Add
respect to sufficiency and power, and consider all three as one
and the same thing.]
? Certys q{uo}d I it nys no doute ?at it
nis ry?t wor?i to ben reuerenced. ? Lat vs q{uo}d she ?an
adden reuerence to suffisaunce {and} to power ? So ?at
we demen ?at ?ise ?re ?