? For
whiche it byhoue? firste to shewen ?at no ?ing ne bitidi? [?{a}t it ne
bytydith] by necessite. so ?at it may apere ?{a}t ?e p{re}scie{n}ce is
signe of ?is necessite ? or ellys yif ?ere nere no necessite. certys
?
ilke
p{re}science
ne my?
t[e] nat ben signe of ?inge ?at nis nat. ? But
certys it is nowe certeyne ?at ?e preue of ?is susteni? by stedfast
resou{n} ne shal nat ben ladd ne p{ro}ued by signes ne by argumentys
ytaken fro wi? oute. but by causes couenable {and} necessarie ? But ?ou
mayst sein how may it be ?at ?e ?
