e
stoundes of forknowyng [as] now ?
stoundes of forknowyng [as] now ?
Chaucer - Boethius
]
? No for so? e. [q{uod} I] for ? e deuyne sy? t
renne? to-forne {and} see? alle fut{ur}es {and} clepe? hem a? ein 5184
{and} reto{ur}ni? hem to ? e p{re}sence of
hys p{ro}pre knowynge. [[pg 178]]
ne he ne entrechaunge? nat [so] as ? ou wenest ?
e
stoundes of forknowyng [as] now ? is now ? at. but he
ay dwellynge comi? byforn {and} enbrace? at o strook 5188
alle ? i mutac{i}ou{n}s.
[Sidenote: This faculty of comprehending and seeing all things as
present, God does not receive from the issue of futurities, but
from the simplicity of his own nature. ]
and ? is p{re}sence to co{m}p{re}henden
{and} to sen alle ? inges. god ne ha? nat take{n} it of ? e
bitydynge of ? inges forto come. but of hys p{ro}pre symplicite.
? No for so? e. [q{uod} I] for ? e deuyne sy? t
renne? to-forne {and} see? alle fut{ur}es {and} clepe? hem a? ein 5184
{and} reto{ur}ni? hem to ? e p{re}sence of
hys p{ro}pre knowynge. [[pg 178]]
ne he ne entrechaunge? nat [so] as ? ou wenest ?
e
stoundes of forknowyng [as] now ? is now ? at. but he
ay dwellynge comi? byforn {and} enbrace? at o strook 5188
alle ? i mutac{i}ou{n}s.
[Sidenote: This faculty of comprehending and seeing all things as
present, God does not receive from the issue of futurities, but
from the simplicity of his own nature. ]
and ? is p{re}sence to co{m}p{re}henden
{and} to sen alle ? inges. god ne ha? nat take{n} it of ? e
bitydynge of ? inges forto come. but of hys p{ro}pre symplicite.
