No More Learning

inge ? at is ywist nis nat knowen by hys nature
p{ro}pre. but by ? e nature of he{m} ? at comp{re}henden it.
? Lat vs loke now in as moche as it is leueful to vs. as
who sei? lat vs loken now as we mowen whiche ? {a}t ? e 4980
estat is of ? e deuyne substaunce so ? at we mowen [ek]
knowen what his science is.

[Sidenote: All rational creatures agree in affirming that God is
eternal. ]

?
e comune iugement of alle
creatures resonables ? an is ? is ? at god is eterne. lat vs
considere ? a{n} what is et{er}nite. For certys ? at shal 4984
shewen vs to-gidre ? e deuyne nature {and} ? e deuyne
science

[Sidenote: And eternity is a full, total, and perfect possession
of a life which shall never end. This will appear more clearly
from a comparison with temporal things. ]

? Eternite ? an is p{er}fit possessiou{n} {and} al
togidre of lijf interminable {and} ? at shewe? more clerely
by ?