++Who so it be ?at is clere of vertue sad {and} wel ordinat of lyuyng.
?at ha? put vnderfote ?e prowed[e] wierdes {and} loki? vpry?t vpon ey?er
fortune. he may holde hys chiere vndiscomfited. ? ?e rage ne ?e manace
of ?
e
co{m}moeuyng
or chasyng vpwarde hete fro ?
e botme. ne schal not
moeue ?at man. ne ?e vnstable mountaigne ?at hy?t veseuus. ?at wirche?
oute ?oru? hys broken[e] chemineys smokyng fires. ? Ne ?e wey of ?
