Was not fortune
asshamed
of ?
Chaucer - Boethius
ilk[e] same accuso{ur}s.
?
What
may be seid herto. ha? my studie {and} my konnyng
deserued ? us. or ellys ? e forseide dampnaciou{n} of me. 352
made ? at hem ry? tful accuso{ur}s or no (q. d. no{n}).
[Sidenote: Fortune, if not ashamed at this, might at least blush
for the baseness of the accusers. ]
?
Was not fortune asshamed of ? is. [Certes alle hadde
nat fortune ben asshamyd] ? at i{n}nocence was accused.
? it au? t[e] sche haue had schame of ? e fil? e of myn accuso{ur}s. 356
[Linenotes:
335 _whiche_--the whiche
_one_--oon
_somtyme_--whilom
339 _sumtyme_--whilon
340 _go_--gon
_her_--hir
341 _wi? -outen_--withowte
_wolde not_--nolden nat
342 _defended[e]_--defendedyn
_by_--by the
343 _seyne_--seyn
_seyntuaries_--sentuarye
344 _was_--omitted
_comaunded[e]_--comaundede
345 _voided[e]_--voidede
_certeyne_--certeyn
346 _men_--me
_merken_--marke
347 _hoke of iren_--hoot yren
348 _? e_--omitted
_my? t[e] be_--myhte ben
349 _? ilk_--thilke
350 _? ilk[e]_--thilke
351 _be_--ben
_seid_--MS. seide, C.
may be seid herto. ha? my studie {and} my konnyng
deserued ? us. or ellys ? e forseide dampnaciou{n} of me. 352
made ? at hem ry? tful accuso{ur}s or no (q. d. no{n}).
[Sidenote: Fortune, if not ashamed at this, might at least blush
for the baseness of the accusers. ]
?
Was not fortune asshamed of ? is. [Certes alle hadde
nat fortune ben asshamyd] ? at i{n}nocence was accused.
? it au? t[e] sche haue had schame of ? e fil? e of myn accuso{ur}s. 356
[Linenotes:
335 _whiche_--the whiche
_one_--oon
_somtyme_--whilom
339 _sumtyme_--whilon
340 _go_--gon
_her_--hir
341 _wi? -outen_--withowte
_wolde not_--nolden nat
342 _defended[e]_--defendedyn
_by_--by the
343 _seyne_--seyn
_seyntuaries_--sentuarye
344 _was_--omitted
_comaunded[e]_--comaundede
345 _voided[e]_--voidede
_certeyne_--certeyn
346 _men_--me
_merken_--marke
347 _hoke of iren_--hoot yren
348 _? e_--omitted
_my? t[e] be_--myhte ben
349 _? ilk_--thilke
350 _? ilk[e]_--thilke
351 _be_--ben
_seid_--MS. seide, C.