at al ?inge ?at is
ywist nis nat knowen by hys nature p{ro}pre. but by ?e nature of he{m}
?at comp{re}henden it. ? Lat vs loke now in as moche as it is leueful to
vs. as who sei? lat vs loken now as we mowen whiche ?{a}t ?e estat is of
?e deuyne substaunce so ?at we mowen [ek] knowen what his science is. ?
e
comune iugement of alle creatures
resonables
?
an is ?is ?at god is
eterne. lat vs considere ?a{n} what is et{er}nite. For certys ?at shal
shewen vs to-gidre ?e deuyne nature {and} ?e deuyne science ? Eternite
?an is p{er}fit possessiou{n} {and} al togidre of lijf interminable
{and} ?at shewe? more clerely by ?e co{m}parisou{n} or collac{i}ou{n} of
temp{or}el ?inges.
