for ?at ?at ?inges ben to comen. ?er-fore ben ?ei
p{ur}ueid. nat certys for ?ei ben p{ur}ueid. ?er-fore ne bytide ?ei nat.
?it na?eles byhoue?
it by
necessite
?
at ei?er ?e ?inges to comen ben
yp{ur}ueied of god. or ellys ?at ?e ?inges ?at ben p{ur}ueied of god
bitiden [.s.] by necessite. ? And ?is ?ing oonly suffise?
