No More Learning

p{re}sent.
wi? outen doute ? ei shulle ben.
but so{m}me of hem descendi? [[pg 177]]
of ? e nature of ? inges as ? e sonne arysynge.
{and} so{m}me descendi? of ? e power of ? e doers as ? e man 5156
walkynge.

[Sidenote: _B.
_ Then I did not go from the truth when I said that
some things referred to the Divine knowledge are necessary, while
considered in themselves they are not under the bond of
necessity. ]

? ? an seide I. no wronge ? at yif ? at ? ise
? inges ben referred to ? e deuyne knowynge ? an ben ? ei
necessarie. {and} yif ? ei ben considered by he{m} selfe ? an
ben ? ei absolut from ?