e deuyne
substaunce
so ?
Chaucer - Boethius
]]
++? Er-fore ? an as I haue shewed a litel her byforne ? at al ? inge ? at is
ywist nis nat knowen by hys nature p{ro}pre. but by ? e nature of he{m}
? at comp{re}henden it. ? Lat vs loke now in as moche as it is leueful to
vs. as who sei? lat vs loken now as we mowen whiche ? {a}t ? e estat is of
?
e deuyne substaunce so ? at we mowen [ek] knowen what his science is. ? e
comune iugement of alle creatures resonables ? an is ? is ? at god is
eterne. lat vs considere ? a{n} what is et{er}nite. For certys ? at shal
shewen vs to-gidre ? e deuyne nature {and} ? e deuyne science ? Eternite
? an is p{er}fit possessiou{n} {and} al togidre of lijf interminable
{and} ? at shewe?
++? Er-fore ? an as I haue shewed a litel her byforne ? at al ? inge ? at is
ywist nis nat knowen by hys nature p{ro}pre. but by ? e nature of he{m}
? at comp{re}henden it. ? Lat vs loke now in as moche as it is leueful to
vs. as who sei? lat vs loken now as we mowen whiche ? {a}t ? e estat is of
?
e deuyne substaunce so ? at we mowen [ek] knowen what his science is. ? e
comune iugement of alle creatures resonables ? an is ? is ? at god is
eterne. lat vs considere ? a{n} what is et{er}nite. For certys ? at shal
shewen vs to-gidre ? e deuyne nature {and} ? e deuyne science ? Eternite
? an is p{er}fit possessiou{n} {and} al togidre of lijf interminable
{and} ? at shewe?
