but who so euere wene ?at it be an harde ?ing to
acorde hym to a conclusiou{n}. it is ry?t ?at he shewe ?at so{m}me of ?e
p{re}misses ben fals. or ellys he mot shewe ?at ?e colasiou{n} of
p{re}posic{i}ou{n}s nis nat spedful to a necessarie conclusio{n}. ? and
yif it be nat so. but ?at ?
e p{re}misses ben
yg{ra}nted
?
er nis nat whi
he sholde blame ?e argument. for ?is ?ing ?at I shal telle ?e nowe ne
shal not seme lasse wondirful. but of ?e ?inges ?at ben taken al so it
is necessarie as who so sei? it folwe? of ?at whiche ?at is p{ur}posed
byforn.
