at yif ?at we mowe{n} I
conseil[e] ?at we enhanse vs in to ?e hey?t of ?ilke souereyne
i{n}telligence. for ?ere shal resou{n} wel seen ?at ?at it ne may nat
by-holden in it self. and certys ?at is ?is in what manere ?e
p{re}science of god see? alle ?
inges
c{er}teins
{and} difinissed al ?
ou?
?ei ne han no certein issues or by-tydynges. ne ?is is non oppiniou{n}
but it is ra?er ?e simplicite of ?e souereyn science ?at nis nat
enclosed nor yshet wi?i{n}ne no boundes.
