hem. for ?ou arguist {and} seist ?us. ?at
yif it ne seme nat to men ?at so{m}me ?inges han certeyne {and}
necessarie bytidynges. ?ei ne mowen nat ben wist byforn certeynely to
bytiden. ?a{n} nis [ther] no p{re}science of ?ilke ?inges. {and} yif we
trowen ?
at
p{re}science
ben in ?
ise ?inges. ?an is ?er no ?inge ?at it
ne bitidi? by necessite. but certys yif we my?te{n} han ?e iugeme{n}t of
?e deuyne ?ou?t as we ben p{ar}son{er}s of resou{n}. ry?