ou puttest a litel her byforne. ?at is to seyne ?at it
is vnwor?i ?inge to seyn ?at oure futures ?euen cause of ?e science of
god ? For c{er}tys ?is streng?e of ?e deuyne science whiche ?at enbrace?
alle ?
inge by his p{re}sentarie knowynge
establisse? manere to alle
?i{n}g{us} {and} it ne awi? nat to lattere ?inges. {and} syn ?at ?ise
?inges ben ?us. ?at is to seyn syn ?at necessite nis nat in ?inges by ?e
deuyne p{re}science. ?
