e but it
byholde?
Chaucer - Boethius
{a}t it be diuerse fro ?
e hoolnesse of science.
?
at
any man sholde deme a ? ing to ben o? {er}weyes ? an it is 4800
it self {and} ? e cause of ? is erro{ur} {et}c'. {vt sup}ra. by wit.
[Sidenote: Reason, without the aid of Imagination and Sense, in
considering things in general, comprehends all imaginable and
sensible things. ]
ne it ne vse? nat nor of resou{n} ne of ymaginac{i}ou{n} ne
of wit wi? oute for?
e but it byholde? alle ? inges so as I
shal seye. by a strok of ? ou? t formely wi? oute disco{ur}s 4804
or collac{i}ou{n} ? Certys resou{n} whan it loke? any ? ing
vniu{er}sel it ne vse? nat of ymaginac{i}ou{n} nor of wit {and}
algates ? it [it] co{m}prendi? ? e ? inges ymaginable {and}
sensible.
[Sidenote: For instance, reason defines her general conceptions
thus:--]
[Sidenote: [* fol.
any man sholde deme a ? ing to ben o? {er}weyes ? an it is 4800
it self {and} ? e cause of ? is erro{ur} {et}c'. {vt sup}ra. by wit.
[Sidenote: Reason, without the aid of Imagination and Sense, in
considering things in general, comprehends all imaginable and
sensible things. ]
ne it ne vse? nat nor of resou{n} ne of ymaginac{i}ou{n} ne
of wit wi? oute for?
e but it byholde? alle ? inges so as I
shal seye. by a strok of ? ou? t formely wi? oute disco{ur}s 4804
or collac{i}ou{n} ? Certys resou{n} whan it loke? any ? ing
vniu{er}sel it ne vse? nat of ymaginac{i}ou{n} nor of wit {and}
algates ? it [it] co{m}prendi? ? e ? inges ymaginable {and}
sensible.
[Sidenote: For instance, reason defines her general conceptions
thus:--]
[Sidenote: [* fol.
