at ne
knowe{n}
it
nat.
nat.
Chaucer - Boethius
er folk demen hem wor?
i of to{ur}ment.
but lat vs
graunt[e] I pose ? at som man may wel demen or knowen ? e goode folk {and}
? e badde. May he ? an knowen {and} seen ? ilke inrest attemp{er}aunce of
corages. as it ha? ben wont to be said of bodyes. as who sai? may a man
speken {and} determine of attemp{er}aunce in corages. as men were wont
to demen or speken of complexiou{n}s {and} attemp{er}aunces of bodies
(q' non). ne it [ne] is nat an vnlyke miracle to hem ?
at ne knowe{n} it
nat. ? As who sei? . but is lyke a merueil or a miracle to hem ? at ne
knowe{n} it nat. whi ? at swete ? inges [ben] couenable to some bodies ? at
ben hool {and} to some bodies bittre ? inges ben couenable. {and} also
whi ? at some seke folk ben holpen w{i}t{h} ly? t medicines [{and} some
folk ben holpen w{i}t{h} sharppe medicynes] but na? eles ? e leche ?
graunt[e] I pose ? at som man may wel demen or knowen ? e goode folk {and}
? e badde. May he ? an knowen {and} seen ? ilke inrest attemp{er}aunce of
corages. as it ha? ben wont to be said of bodyes. as who sai? may a man
speken {and} determine of attemp{er}aunce in corages. as men were wont
to demen or speken of complexiou{n}s {and} attemp{er}aunces of bodies
(q' non). ne it [ne] is nat an vnlyke miracle to hem ?
at ne knowe{n} it
nat. ? As who sei? . but is lyke a merueil or a miracle to hem ? at ne
knowe{n} it nat. whi ? at swete ? inges [ben] couenable to some bodies ? at
ben hool {and} to some bodies bittre ? inges ben couenable. {and} also
whi ? at some seke folk ben holpen w{i}t{h} ly? t medicines [{and} some
folk ben holpen w{i}t{h} sharppe medicynes] but na? eles ? e leche ?
