e
p{re}scie{n}ce
is signe of ?
Chaucer - Boethius
e ?
ing ?
at it signifie?
.
[Sidenote: Wherefore, it must be first proved that everything
happens by necessity before we can conclude that prescience is a
sign of that necessity. ]
? For whiche it byhoue? firste to shewen ? at no ? ing
ne bitidi? [? {a}t it ne bytydith] by necessite. so ? at it 4704
may apere ? {a}t ?
e p{re}scie{n}ce is signe of ? is necessite
[Sidenote: For if there be no necessity, prescience cannot be the
sign of that which has no existence. ]
? or ellys yif ? ere nere no necessite. certys ? ilke p{re}science
ne my? t[e] nat ben signe of ? inge ? at nis nat.
[Linenotes:
4677 _? inge[s]_--thinges
4683 _whiche_--which
4685 _better_--beter{e}
4688 _moche_--mochel
4689 _frewille_--free wyl
4691 _? at ne_--? at is ne
4692 _? at_--MS. ?
[Sidenote: Wherefore, it must be first proved that everything
happens by necessity before we can conclude that prescience is a
sign of that necessity. ]
? For whiche it byhoue? firste to shewen ? at no ? ing
ne bitidi? [? {a}t it ne bytydith] by necessite. so ? at it 4704
may apere ? {a}t ?
e p{re}scie{n}ce is signe of ? is necessite
[Sidenote: For if there be no necessity, prescience cannot be the
sign of that which has no existence. ]
? or ellys yif ? ere nere no necessite. certys ? ilke p{re}science
ne my? t[e] nat ben signe of ? inge ? at nis nat.
[Linenotes:
4677 _? inge[s]_--thinges
4683 _whiche_--which
4685 _better_--beter{e}
4688 _moche_--mochel
4689 _frewille_--free wyl
4691 _? at ne_--? at is ne
4692 _? at_--MS. ?
