[In whych
man{er}e
q{uo}d I.
Chaucer - Boethius
ne ?
is ne may nat be wi?
seid
in no manere.
[Sidenote: But let us see how we can firmly and irrefragably prove
that the Supreme God contains in his own nature a plenitude of
perfect and consummate good. ]
? But I p{re}ie ? e q{uo}d she see now how
? ou mayst preuen holily {and} wi? -oute{n} corrupciou{n} ? is
? at I haue seid. ? at ? e souereyne god is ry? t ful of 2504
souereyne goode.
[In whych man{er}e q{uo}d I. ] wenest
? ou ou? t q{uo}d she ? at ? is p{r}ince of alle ? inges haue
ytake ? ilke souereyne good any where ? an of hym self.
? of whiche souereyne goode men p{ro}ue? ? at he is ful 2508
ry? t as ? ou my? test ?
in no manere.
[Sidenote: But let us see how we can firmly and irrefragably prove
that the Supreme God contains in his own nature a plenitude of
perfect and consummate good. ]
? But I p{re}ie ? e q{uo}d she see now how
? ou mayst preuen holily {and} wi? -oute{n} corrupciou{n} ? is
? at I haue seid. ? at ? e souereyne god is ry? t ful of 2504
souereyne goode.
[In whych man{er}e q{uo}d I. ] wenest
? ou ou? t q{uo}d she ? at ? is p{r}ince of alle ? inges haue
ytake ? ilke souereyne good any where ? an of hym self.
? of whiche souereyne goode men p{ro}ue? ? at he is ful 2508
ry? t as ? ou my? test ?
