at he wit[e] egaly.
as who sei? indifferently ?at ?inges mowen ben don or ellys nat don.
what is ?ilke p{re}science ?at ne comp{re}hendi? no certeyne ?inge ne
stable. or ellys what difference is ?er bytwixe ?e p{re}science. {and}
?ilke iape-wor?
i
dyuynynge
of Tiresie ?
e diuino{ur} ?at seide. ? Al ?at
I seie q{uo}d he ey?er it shal be. or ellys it ne shal nat be. Or ellis
how moche is wor?e ?e diuyne p{re}science more ?an ?e oppiniou{n} of
mankynde yif so be ?at it deme? ?e ?
