e more
stedfast
{and}
to ?
to ?
Chaucer - Boethius
at 4920
? at is ymaginable. {and} ? at ? ilke two ? at is to seyn wit
{and} ymaginac{i}ou{n} ne mowe{n} nat strecchen ne enhaunsen
hem self to knowynge of vniuersalite for ? at
? e knowy{n}g of hem ne may exceden nor so{ur}mou{n}te{n} 4924
? e bodyly figure[s] ? Certys of ? e knowyng of ? inges
men au? ten ra? er ? eue credence to ?
e more stedfast {and}
to ? e more p{er}fit iugement.
[Sidenote: In a controversy of this kind ought not we, who possess
faculties of reason, &c. , to side with reason and espouse her
cause? ]
In ? is manere stryuynge
? an we ? at han streng? e of resonynge {and} of ymaginynge 4928
{and} of wit ? at is to seyn by resou{n} {and} by ymaginac{i}ou{n}
{and} by wit. [{and}] we sholde ra? er p{re}ise ? e cause
of resou{n}. as who sei? ? an ?
? at is ymaginable. {and} ? at ? ilke two ? at is to seyn wit
{and} ymaginac{i}ou{n} ne mowe{n} nat strecchen ne enhaunsen
hem self to knowynge of vniuersalite for ? at
? e knowy{n}g of hem ne may exceden nor so{ur}mou{n}te{n} 4924
? e bodyly figure[s] ? Certys of ? e knowyng of ? inges
men au? ten ra? er ? eue credence to ?
e more stedfast {and}
to ? e more p{er}fit iugement.
[Sidenote: In a controversy of this kind ought not we, who possess
faculties of reason, &c. , to side with reason and espouse her
cause? ]
In ? is manere stryuynge
? an we ? at han streng? e of resonynge {and} of ymaginynge 4928
{and} of wit ? at is to seyn by resou{n} {and} by ymaginac{i}ou{n}
{and} by wit. [{and}] we sholde ra? er p{re}ise ? e cause
of resou{n}. as who sei? ? an ?
