No More Learning

is condicioun ne drawe? nat wi? hir ? ilke
necessite symple. For certys ? is necessite condicionel.
? e p{ro}pre nature of it ne make? it nau? t.
but ? e adiecc{i}ou{n} [[pg 176]]
of ? e condic{i}ou{n} maki? it.

[Sidenote: No necessity compels a man to walk who does so
willingly, but it must be necessary that he walk when he does step
forward.
]

for no necessite ne constreyne? 5124
a man to [gon / ? {a}t] goo? by his p{ro}pre wille. al be it
so ? at whan he goo? ? at it is necessarie ? at he goo? .

[Sidenote: So everything that is present to the eye of Providence
must assuredly be, although there is nothing in its own nature to
constitute that necessity. ]

? Ry? t on ? is same manere ? an.