_ Your
conclusions
follow from your premises.
Chaucer - Boethius
I.
[Sidenote: _P. _ But you have owned that true felicity is the
sovereign good; then you must also grant that God is that true
felicity. ]
_P. _ But we han graunted q{uo}d she ? at 2532
souereyne good is blysfulnes. ? at is so? e q{uo}d . I. ? an
q{uo}d she mote we nedes graunten {and} confessen ? at
? ilke same souereyne goode be god.
[Sidenote: _B.
_ Your conclusions follow from your premises. ]
[Sidenote: [* fol. 21 _b_. ]]
? Certys *q{uo}d
. I. I ne may nat denye ne wi? stonde ? e resou{n}s p{ur}posed. 2536
and I see wel ? at it folwe? by streng? e of ? e
p{re}misses.
[Sidenote: _P. _ Let us see whether we cannot prove this more
convincingly by considering it in this view, that there cannot be
two sovereign goods which differ in themselves.
[Sidenote: _P. _ But you have owned that true felicity is the
sovereign good; then you must also grant that God is that true
felicity. ]
_P. _ But we han graunted q{uo}d she ? at 2532
souereyne good is blysfulnes. ? at is so? e q{uo}d . I. ? an
q{uo}d she mote we nedes graunten {and} confessen ? at
? ilke same souereyne goode be god.
[Sidenote: _B.
_ Your conclusions follow from your premises. ]
[Sidenote: [* fol. 21 _b_. ]]
? Certys *q{uo}d
. I. I ne may nat denye ne wi? stonde ? e resou{n}s p{ur}posed. 2536
and I see wel ? at it folwe? by streng? e of ? e
p{re}misses.
[Sidenote: _P. _ Let us see whether we cannot prove this more
convincingly by considering it in this view, that there cannot be
two sovereign goods which differ in themselves.
