at ben taken al so it
is
necessarie
as who so sei?
Chaucer - Boethius
? and
yif it be nat so. but ?at ?e p{re}misses ben yg{ra}nted ?er nis nat whi
he sholde blame ?e argument. for ?is ?ing ?at I shal telle ?e nowe ne
shal not seme lasse wondirful. but of ?e ?inges ?
at ben taken al so it
is
necessarie
as who so sei?
it folwe? of ?at whiche ?at is p{ur}posed
byforn. what is ?at q{uo}d I. ? certys q{uo}d she ?at is ?at ?{a}t ?ise
wicked shrewes ben more blysful or ellys lasse wrecches. ?at byen ?e
tourmentes ?
