]
ne also ne accorde?
ne also ne accorde?
Chaucer - Boethius
t.
{and} had[de] for?
eten ?
at he 3676
euer saw {and} wende ? {a}t no ? ing ne fayled[e] hym of
p{er}fecc{i}ou{n} of ma{n}kynde. now we ? at my? ten sen ? e
same ? ing wolde we nat wene ? at he were bly{n}de (q. d.
sic).
[Sidenote: The vulgar will not assent to what I am going to say,
though supported by conclusive arguments--to wit, that persons are
more unhappy that do wrong than those who suffer wrong.
]
ne also ne accorde? nat ? e poeple to ? at I shal 3680
seyne. ? e whiche ? ing is susteyned by a stronge foundement
of resou{n}s. ? at is to seyn ? at more vnsely ben ? ei
? at don wrong to o? er folk. ? en ? ei ?
euer saw {and} wende ? {a}t no ? ing ne fayled[e] hym of
p{er}fecc{i}ou{n} of ma{n}kynde. now we ? at my? ten sen ? e
same ? ing wolde we nat wene ? at he were bly{n}de (q. d.
sic).
[Sidenote: The vulgar will not assent to what I am going to say,
though supported by conclusive arguments--to wit, that persons are
more unhappy that do wrong than those who suffer wrong.
]
ne also ne accorde? nat ? e poeple to ? at I shal 3680
seyne. ? e whiche ? ing is susteyned by a stronge foundement
of resou{n}s. ? at is to seyn ? at more vnsely ben ? ei
? at don wrong to o? er folk. ? en ? ei ?
