at
blisfulnesse
were
conioigned *al of one membre alone.
conioigned *al of one membre alone.
Chaucer - Boethius
[Sidenote: But it has been well shown that all these things are
the same and do not differ--therefore they are not parts, for if
they were, happiness might be made up of one member--which is
absurd and impossible. ]
? Certis
q{uo}d I it ha? wel ben shewed her byforne. ? at alle ? ise
? inges ben alle on ? ing. ? an ben ? ei none membris q{uo}d 2600
she.
[Sidenote: [* fol. 22. ]]
for ellys it sholde seme ?
at blisfulnesse were
conioigned *al of one membre alone. but ? at is a ? i{n}g
? at may nat ben doon.
[Sidenote: _B. _ This I doubt not, but I desire to hear the
sequel. ]
? is ? ing q{uo}d . I. nys nat
doutous. but I abide to herkene ? e remenaunt of ? e 2604
questiou{n}.
[Sidenote: _P.
