e whiche shrewes it were a more couenable ?ing ?at ?e accuso{ur}s or
aduocat? not wro?e but pitous {and} debonaire ladden ?e shrewes ?at han
don wro{n}g to ?e Iugement. ry?t as men leden seke folk to ?e leche. for
?at ?ei sholden seken out ?
e
maladies
of synne by to{ur}ment?
. and by
?is couenaunt ey?er ?e entent of ?e defendo{ur}s or aduocat? sholde
fayle {and} cesen in al. or ellys yif ?e office of aduocat? wolde
bettre p{ro}fiten to men. it sholde be to{ur}ned in to ?e habit of
accusac{i}ou{n}. ?at is [to] s[e]yn ?ei sholde{n} accuse shrewes.
