at is in ?e singuler peces.
? But ?e eye of intelligence is hey?er for it so{ur}mou{n}te? ?e
envirounynge of ?e vniu{er}site {and} looke? ouer ?at by pure subtilite
of ?ou?t. ?ilk same symple forme of man ?
at is
p{er}durably
in ?
e deuyne
?ou?t. in whiche ?is au?t[e] gretely to ben considered ?at ?e heyest
streng?e to co{m}prehenden ?inges enbrace? {and} conteyne? ?e lower[e]
streng?e [but the lower{e} strengthe ne arysith nat in no maner{e} to
heyer{e} strengthe]. for wit ne may no ?
