No More Learning

so as ey? er of hem lakki? to
o? ir.

[Sidenote: That which is not perfect cannot be the supreme good. ]

but ? at ? at nis nat p{er}fit men may seen apertly
? at it nis nat souereyne.

[Sidenote: Neither can the chief good be essentially different. ]

? e ? inges ? an ? at ben 2544
souereynely goode ne mowen by no wey ben diuerse.
[Sidenote: But it has been shown that God and happiness are the
chief good, wherefore the sovereign felicity and the Supreme
Divinity are one and the same. ]

? But I haue wel conclude ? at blisfulnesse {and} god ben
[the] souereyne goode. For whiche it mot nedes be ? at
souereyne blisfulnesse is souerey[ne] dyuynite. ? No 2548
? ing q{uo}d I nis more so? efast ? an ? is ne more ferme by
resou{n}. ne a more wor? i ? ing ? an god may nat ben
concluded.