ing
nis nat ?at same ?ing. fro whiche it is vndirstonde{n} to ben diu{er}s.
?an folwe? it. ?at ?ilke ?i{n}g ?at by hys nature is dyuers from
souereyne good. ?at ?at ?
ing nys nat
souereyne
good.
but certys ?at were
a felonous corsednesse to ?inken ?at of hym. ?at no ?ing nis more wor?e.
For alwey of alle ?inges. ?e nat{ur}e of hem ne may nat ben better ?an
his bygy{n}nyng. ? For whiche I may concluden by ry?
