t as
i{n}telligence
is oonly ?
Chaucer - Boethius
to bestes ?
at ne
mowen nat moeuen hem self here ne ? ere. as oystres {and} muscles {and}
o? er swiche shelle fysshe of ? e see. ? {a}t cliue{n} {and} ben norissed
to roches. but ? e ymaginac{i}ou{n} come? to remuable bestes ? at seme{n}
to han talent to fleen or to desiren any ? inge. but resou{n} is al only
to ? e lynage of mankynde ry?
t as i{n}telligence is oonly ? e deuyne
nature. of whiche it folwe? ? at ? ilke knowyng is more wor? e ? an
[th]is[e] o? er. syn it knowe? by hys p{ro}pre nature nat only hys
subiect. as who sei? it ne knowe? nat al oonly ? at app{er}teini?
p{ro}prely to hys knowynge.
mowen nat moeuen hem self here ne ? ere. as oystres {and} muscles {and}
o? er swiche shelle fysshe of ? e see. ? {a}t cliue{n} {and} ben norissed
to roches. but ? e ymaginac{i}ou{n} come? to remuable bestes ? at seme{n}
to han talent to fleen or to desiren any ? inge. but resou{n} is al only
to ? e lynage of mankynde ry?
t as i{n}telligence is oonly ? e deuyne
nature. of whiche it folwe? ? at ? ilke knowyng is more wor? e ? an
[th]is[e] o? er. syn it knowe? by hys p{ro}pre nature nat only hys
subiect. as who sei? it ne knowe? nat al oonly ? at app{er}teini?
p{ro}prely to hys knowynge.
