?at men seen any
?ing ?at is inperfit . certys in ?ilke general ?er mot ben somme
?ing ?at is perfit. For yif so be ?at perfeccioun is don awey .
men may nat ?inke nor seye fro whennes ?ilke ?ing is ?
at is cleped inperfit
.
For ?e nature of ?inges ne token nat her bygynnyng of
?inges amenused and inperfit . but it procedi? of ?ingus ?at ben
al hool . and absolut . and descende? so doune in-to outerest
?inges and in-to ?ingus empty and wi?-oute fruyt . but as I haue
shewed a litel her byforne .
