at were
a grete meruayle {and} an enbaissynge wi?
a grete meruayle {and} an enbaissynge wi?
Chaucer - Boethius
at swiche
? inges ben don in ? e regne of god ? at alle ? inges woot. 3104
and alle ? inges may {and} ne wool nat but only goode
? inges.
[Sidenote: _P. _ It were indeed, not only marvellous, but also
horribly monstrous, if, in the well-regulated family of so great a
master, the worthless vessels should be honoured and the precious
ones be despised:--but it is not so. ]
? ? an seide she ? us. certys q{uo}d she ?
at were
a grete meruayle {and} an enbaissynge wi? outen ende.
{and} wel more horrible ? an alle monstres yif it were as 3108
? {o}u wenest. ? at is to sein. ? at in ? e ry? t ordeyne house
of so mochel a fader {and} an ordenour of meyne. ? at ? e
vesseles ? at ben foule {and} vyle sholde ben hono{ur}ed
{and} heried. and ?
? inges ben don in ? e regne of god ? at alle ? inges woot. 3104
and alle ? inges may {and} ne wool nat but only goode
? inges.
[Sidenote: _P. _ It were indeed, not only marvellous, but also
horribly monstrous, if, in the well-regulated family of so great a
master, the worthless vessels should be honoured and the precious
ones be despised:--but it is not so. ]
? ? an seide she ? us. certys q{uo}d she ?
at were
a grete meruayle {and} an enbaissynge wi? outen ende.
{and} wel more horrible ? an alle monstres yif it were as 3108
? {o}u wenest. ? at is to sein. ? at in ? e ry? t ordeyne house
of so mochel a fader {and} an ordenour of meyne. ? at ? e
vesseles ? at ben foule {and} vyle sholde ben hono{ur}ed
{and} heried. and ?
