?at no ?ing nis more wor?e.
For alwey of alle ?inges. ?e nat{ur}e of hem ne may nat ben better ?an
his bygy{n}nyng. ? For whiche I may concluden by ry?t uerray resou{n}.
?at ?ilke ?
at is
bygynnyng
of alle ?
inges. ?ilke same ?ing is good in
his substaunce. _B._ ?ou hast seid ry?tfully q{uo}d .I. _P._ But we han
graunted q{uo}d she ?at souereyne good is blysfulnes. ?at is so?e q{uo}d
.
