at I haue seid. ?at ?e souereyne god is ry?t ful of 2504
souereyne goode. [In whych man{er}e q{uo}d I.] wenest
?ou ou?t q{uo}d she ?at ?is p{r}ince of alle ?inges haue
ytake ?ilke souereyne good any where ?an of hym self.
?
of whiche
souereyne
goode men p{ro}ue?
?at he is ful 2508
ry?t as ?ou my?test ?inken. ?at god ?at ha? blisfulnesse
in hym self. {and} ?at ilke blisfulnesse ?at is in hym
were diu{er}s in substaunce.
[Sidenote: If you think that God has received this good from
without, then you must believe that the giver of this good is more
excellent than God the receiver.]
