at ben diuerse amo[n]ges hem self. ?at on is nat ?at ?at o?er is. ?an
[ne] mowen nei?er of hem ben p{er}fit. so as ey?er of hem lakki? to
o?ir. but ?at ?
at nis nat
p{er}fit
men may seen apertly ?
at it nis nat
souereyne. ?e ?inges ?an ?at ben souereynely goode ne mowen by no wey
ben diuerse. ? But I haue wel conclude ?at blisfulnesse {and} god ben
[the] souereyne goode. For whiche it mot nedes be ?at souereyne
blisfulnesse is souerey[ne] dyuynite. ? No ?ing q{uo}d I nis more
so?efast ?
