[Sidenote: Nor do I approve of the
reasoning
made use of by some.
Chaucer - Boethius
at ?ei my?ten wry?en awey in o?er manere ?an ?ei 4452
ben purueyed. ?an ne sholde ?er ben no stedfast p{re}science
of ?inge to comen but ra?er an vncerteyn
oppiniou{n}. ?e whiche ?inge to trowen on god I deme it
felonie {and} vnleueful.
[Sidenote: Nor do I approve of the
reasoning
made use of by some.
For they say that a thing is not necessarily to happen because God
hath foreseen it, but rather because it is to happen it cannot be
hid from the divine Providence.]
? Ne I ne proeue nat ?ilk 4456
same resou{n}. as who sei? I ne allowe nat. or I ne p{re}ise
nat ?ilke same resou{n} by whiche ?at som men wenen
?at ?ei mowen assoilen {and} vnknytten ?e knot of ?is
questiou{n}. ? For certys ?
